tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10263436.post112189889841740263..comments2023-09-25T06:18:29.642-07:00Comments on NEW MEXICO LAW AND SOCIETY: SHERIFF SHOULD EXPLAIN NON-ACTION; JUDGE HAD TO DRIVE TO JAIL TO GET ORDER HONOREDJack L. Lovehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08912963870663696435noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10263436.post-1122512608426520502005-07-27T18:03:00.000-07:002005-07-27T18:03:00.000-07:00Sr. Der Tommissar: Thanks for reading the blog. ...Sr. Der Tommissar: Thanks for reading the blog. You are right, there is explaining due from all around. If the accused is impaired, perhaps he should be held until he sobers up, even if someone is willing to take him home. But a Magistrate (Judge) should stand between him and the arresting officer and jailer. That is my view. jackJack L. Lovehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08912963870663696435noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10263436.post-1122503844894706812005-07-27T15:37:00.000-07:002005-07-27T15:37:00.000-07:00A judge's friend call him to get her husband out o...A judge's friend call him to get her husband out of jail? So the judge just goes and sets some bail on the fly, gets it paid real quick, then orders the guy released?<BR/><BR/>That's not a problem? Isn't this a huge conflict of interest? If the guy was under the influence, what should the jailor do, hand him back the keys to his car?<BR/><BR/>Don't most public drunkeness suspects get promtply thrown into the tank without appearing before a magistrate? Or is the problem here that he went to the county jail without being arraigned instead of being held at the station?<BR/><BR/>I'm just trying to follow the chain of events here, if anything it seems like there is plenty of explaining to go around.Der Tommissarhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15472783989590022328noreply@blogger.com